“Out-of-state and казино вулкан победа на русском international gambling conglomerates have long targeted Florida and will continue to do so, whether next year or in the future,” the vulkan stavka зеркало politician said. “Voters have rejected them time and again because they increase crime, gambling addiction, government corruption and other social ills that taxpayers ultimately pay for. “Murky case law has created the presumption that legislators now have this authority. It certainly is not the first time that legislators have tried and failed at expanding gaming on the state level. We hope to argue this point before the Florida Supreme Court in an upcoming case.
But in the event of an unfavorable ruling, this amendment would ensure voters maintain the exclusive right to approve or reject casino-style gambling.” Scott also commented on the notion of outsiders infiltrating the gambling sector in Florida, which is largely influenced by the local Seminole Tribe. Though?, will voters rule in favor of expanded вулкан игровые автоматы на деньги престиж gambling this time. Достаточно известный, по отзывам Рокс казино – современный и надежный игровой портал. They also would threaten Florida’s multibillion-dollar family-friendly tourism brand that has led our economy forward while gambling-dependent economies continue to lag.” It certainly seems that Florida legislators are confident in the residents’ ability to discern what is best for the Sunshine State. The most recent attempt to find common ground is the third in an expansive history of Florida lawmakers disagreeing with one another concerning gambling in the region, in fact.
Outsiders will have to wait to see the outcome of the November elections. Governor Rick Scott commented on the “Voters in Charge” amendment that fuels the current dilemma during a 2014 interview with the Orlando Sentinel. “We believe that Florida’s constitution gives only voters the power to authorize casino-style gambling in Florida,” he explained.